🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing number of countries are exploring parallel bans.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' youth". A law is expected to be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked parliament to approve a proposal raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended parents to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is granted. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a useful foundation," stated a leading MEP supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "based on strong research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to further research the matter.

Charities have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the family of a girl who died after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for children," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, action is primarily occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating guardian approval for minors to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some politicians to copy this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Beyond the West, other countries are also exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies take a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could backfire". The body points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this global discussion continues, the steps of this nation and others indicate that governments around the world are no longer prepared to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.